RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01398
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to reflect a year of satisfactory
service for retirement from 1995 thru 1998.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not fully credited with points to include satisfactory
years of service for retirement.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard in
the grade of lieutenant colonel.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force at Exhibit B.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states the applicant has
provided copies of AF Forms 40A for the inclusive period in
question; however, there is no evidence to support the claim
that he was authorized to perform the duty and that the approved
AF Forms 40A were submitted as required in accordance with AFI
36-2254V1. Thus, in the absence of the required signed
documentation by the appropriate approval authorities.
Specifically, the applicant's supervisor and IMA program manager
at the time, for the period of time that is being claimed; the
commands basis for disapproval is established.
The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 1 October 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application is timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the applicants
complete submission, we are not persuaded the record warrants
the requested correction. The applicants contentions are duly
noted; however, he has not provided evidence to override the
rationale provided by the Air Force office of primary
responsibility (OPR). Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the OPR and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01398 in Executive Session on 5 February 2015,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 March 2014, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 9 July 2014.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2014.
2
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03153
He be reinstated as an active member of the Air Force Reserve, effective 15 October 2010, with award of IDT points consistent with the average IDT points he earned between 1 March 2008 and 31 March 2010. In this respect, we believe the evidence provided makes it clear that a serious personality conflict existed between the applicant and certain members of his chain of command as validated by Inspector General (IG) complaints filed by his supervisory chain and the applicant himself, as well...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01701
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01701 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. While the applicant contends his DNIF status during an extend period of time unjustly precluded him from attaining 50 points for his year ending 29 Nov 11, the Board believes it is the responsibility of each individual service member to carefully track their personal service and points, and to work with his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04813
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) enlisted promotion and demotion policy was folded into an active duty Air Force publication AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion/Demotion Programs, 31 December 2009. Air Force Reserve enlisted members are promoted to chief master sergeant in accordance with AFPD 36-25, Military Promotion and Demotions and Air Force Reserve Enlisted Promotion Policy. Based on this...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01630
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01630 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Senior Airman (SrA) be changed from 5 Mar 14 to 13 Jan 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02153
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01117
Prior to departing for his deployment in Jan 2011, the applicant was on the extension which provided sufficient retainability for his deployment. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's Air Force records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03173
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03173 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so she may reenlist. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02352 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive pay and points for the period Dec 10 through Nov 12. Her medical facility failed to provide the proper documentation to the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) medical board, causing her referral to a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB)....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04129
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04129 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four points for a satisfactory year of service for retention/retirement (R/R) year 2010/2011. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air...